I don't see that it makes any difference.
If I try the following and compare the lock output for both isolation levels in winmerge they are exactly the same (and even putting it up to SERIALIZABLE doesn't change the output).
/*Do once so compilation and caching out the way*/
EXEC('select st.text, qp.query_plan, cp.cacheobjtype, cp.objtype, cp.plan_handle
from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cp
cross apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text(cp.plan_handle) st
cross apply sys.dm_exec_query_plan(cp.plan_handle) qp')
DBCC TRACEON(1200,3604,-1);
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
PRINT 'READ COMMITTED'
EXEC('select st.text, qp.query_plan, cp.cacheobjtype, cp.objtype, cp.plan_handle
from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cp
cross apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text(cp.plan_handle) st
cross apply sys.dm_exec_query_plan(cp.plan_handle) qp')
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
PRINT 'READ UNCOMMITTED'
EXEC('select st.text, qp.query_plan, cp.cacheobjtype, cp.objtype, cp.plan_handle
from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cp
cross apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text(cp.plan_handle) st
cross apply sys.dm_exec_query_plan(cp.plan_handle) qp')
DBCC TRACEOFF(1200,3604,-1);