0

I'm trying to think through a new experimental set-up, involving a sheet of water being shot up over a step structure. The water sheet will be about 5" wide, and the camera will be positioned orthogonally to the flow direction. I'd like to take some high-speed images of a single cross-section of the resulting water spray/jet, preferably near the center of the stream. But to do this, the camera has to see through ~2-3" of a complex water/air flow (i.e, the water between the center of the spray and the camera).

Obviously, a ray of the light that's making its way from the center of the spray to the camera will be forced to interact with the jet and droplets (of various sizes) that are between the center of the spray and the camera, which can't be good for image quality. Every time the rays have to pass through another globule of water, they'll be diffracted and reflected and all messed up. I've thought of a few approaches that might improve the output:

  1. Illuminate the center of the spray with a laser sheet, paired with the appropriate filter on the camera, such that only the light hitting the center of the spray will make it to the camera sensor.
  2. Minimize the camera/lens depth of field, so that light from outside the desired cross-section is out of focus, as much as possible.
  3. In terms of post-processing, I'm hoping that some background subtraction will improve the quality.

None of this will fix the problem, but I'm hoping it will mitigate it. My gut is unsure of the magnitude of the problem, as well - will I just get slightly messy/blurry images, or will I get complete garbage? Does anyone here have advice or experience? Any suggestions on how to estimate the optical impact of the water splashes before I spend a couple thousand $$ on laser equipment, etc?

bonker
  • 1
  • 2
    Draw a sketch including dimensions of the setup to give an idea of actual forms and directions - do it just to get a possibility to get something useful. BTW if you place something known and solid into the area under your interest can it be photographed with traditional methods? –  Sep 09 '21 at 21:39
  • try asking at a photography site – jsotola Sep 10 '21 at 00:37
  • Interesting question. A sketch, or better yet photos of the water setup in action, would be helpful. You can probably experiment with the illumination by using a cheap laser pointer. For the lens effect of the water, if it's lots of little droplets, moving around over time, there might well be an image processing fix. If it's a more or less continuous mass of water (albeit constantly flowing), again acting as a funny shaped lens, it would be different and maybe more complicated. Maybe temporarily place calibration object (piece of plastic with "graph paper" markings) in the target focal plane – Pete W Sep 10 '21 at 01:43
  • Your description of the water sheet is inadequate: what is its cross-section (perpendicular to direction of flow? Next, the camera "orthogonal to flow" could be pointed along either of the two axes defining the cross-section. – Carl Witthoft Sep 10 '21 at 15:43

0 Answers0