0

Assuming CIDR and classless addressing, the CCNA books I'm reading say

  1. Pearson 640-822 official cert guide 2012, pgs 403-404: According to their method S = P - N (subnet, prefix, host bits respectively). In this case S = 8 - 24 < 0.
  2. CCNA guide 7th literally says in its subnettting chapter that the prefixes /8 through /15 can only be used with class A addresses.

So for example, a subnet 220.0.0.0 cannot have a net mask of 255.0.0.0. Does that really make sense and hold true in the real world? Can a network or subnet really be assigned an IP address with any prefix?

I'm practicing on a c2691 router and it takes the ip route 220.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Serial 0/0 command no problem. If 220.0.0.0 is a subnet, then what is its network?

It also takes ip route 192.0.0.0 192.0.0.0 Serial 0/0. Here we have a "class C" subnet with a mask actually less than 255.0.0.0! Is that possible in the real world?

I just tried adding some routes to my Cisco router and the following output is possible. You can assign the same IP 4.0.0.0 more than once in the same route table. Interestingly, it seems that it won't say "subnetted" unless the route you added has mask at least 255.0.0.0. 

R2(config)#do show ip route
...

     4.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S       4.0.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
S*   198.252.206.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
O       10.1.6.0 [110/128] via 10.1.4.2, 04:54:56, Serial0/1
C       10.1.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
C       10.1.4.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1
C    192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
S    2.0.0.0/7 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
S    4.0.0.0/7 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
S    4.0.0.0/6 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
S    8.0.0.0/6 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
S    12.0.0.0/6 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
T. Webster
  • 366

3 Answers3

3

You mention classless addressing, then immediately mention a Class C network? Your book is outdated, class-based addressing is no more.

While there are definitely certain conventions, you can technically assign any subnet mask to any IP address you want. There are many reasons why this may be a bad idea, however.

Regarding your questions 222.0.0.0 is the network address (network and subnet address are being used interchangeably here).

Jim G.
  • 2,707
3

Your first sentence contains two conflicting pieces of information. You say both "assuming CIDR" and "a class C network." If you are considering CIDR, there is no "Class C" and 220.0.0.0 could have a mask of 255.0.0.0. If you are dealing with 220.0.0.0 as a class C network, then you could not use a 255.0.0.0 mask.

Cisco equipment can be configured either way. For some time you needed to add the "ip classless" statement if you wanted CIDR, but that has been the default setting for probably at least 10-15 years at this point. You can however turn it off ("no ip classless").

While it is almost universally true that networks are now classless, it is still good to understand the class distinction.

There are some "corner cases" where this knowledge is useful. For instance, in the past 3 years, I have come across two consumer devices and one SCADA device that while they learned their IP address and mask through DHCP properly, behaved in a classful manner on the network (and as such had issues). This knowledge allowed me to understand the way they were actually behaving and provide a resolution more quickly (and in one case communicate accurately what was happening to the vendor to get a fix).

So while classes may be obsolete from a network perspective, you can come across devices where the software was was written by developers mistakenly still referencing old code or documentation that is based on classes.

Edit: Now that you have clarified your question some, when you are talking strictly on the technical mechanics, you are correct in saying you cannot have a "subnet" of 220.0.0.0 using a mask of 255.0.0.0. A subnet in this strictly technical sense is referring to the number of additional bits used to subnet the original class. Your example is more accurately speaking a supernet (combining more than one smaller network into a larger one), although the standard for supernetting was meant more to bridge the gap between class B and class C.

In today's networks, generally you can both subnet and supernet and generally classless addressing is considered to include both.

YLearn
  • 1,257
2

Forget about classes, classful networks and their subnets. Since CIDR got introduced in 1993 we just have prefixes and more specific prefixes.

Sander Steffann
  • 8,222