0

I'm upgrading to a dedicated server, and I've decided between two servers, but I don't know which to choose. The differences between the two configurations are:

Server 1: Intel Xeon W3520(4 cores/ 8 threads), 2.66 GHz+, 32 GB ECC RAM, 2 X 2TB SATA Server 2: Intel Xeon E3 1225v2(4 cores/ 4 threads), 3.2 GHz+, 32 GB Non-ECC RAM, 3 x 120 GB SSD

The server will be a LAMP, and probably Debian 7.

After searching I found that ECC RAM is definitely optimal for a server, especially for mine (I got 40,000 monthly hits on shared hosting), and doesn't really impact speed.

The first server also has 8 threads to Server 2's 4, but server 2 has 3.2 GHz+ and I get the all-important SSDs. The reduction in sze available is not important to me.

I couldn't find an answer online. Should I go for server 1 because of its ECC RAM and double the # of threads, or should I go for the SSDs, and higher CPU frequency?

ashraj98
  • 173

1 Answers1

-2

Go for ECC RAM.

Reasons

  • You need more RAM than disk IO, so you do not need SSDs

    • You want to see RAM errors, before it's too late

    • More Cores are propably more important than CPU speed in your use case

Nils
  • 7,815